Laing’s account of self-consciousness centres on a paradox: another person’s attention can help someone feel real while also making them feel exposed. In The Divided Self, he examines how the wish to be recognised can coexist with efforts to remain hidden, and how constant self-observation may promise security while making spontaneous participation increasingly difficult.
Two meanings of self-consciousness
Chapter 7 distinguishes awareness of oneself from awareness of oneself as an object of someone else’s attention. Both occur in ordinary life. Laing is interested in situations where they become persistent, threatening and tightly connected with a precarious sense of identity. He explicitly acknowledges that heightened self-consciousness is also common outside the situations his book examines. [1]
Laing begins by separating two kinds of awareness:
Self-consciousness, as the term is ordinarily used, implies two things: an awareness of oneself by oneself, and an awareness of oneself as an object of someone else’s observation.
R. D. Laing — The Divided Self, p. 106 [1]
The distinction matters because familiar embarrassment cannot simply be equated with ontological insecurity. Worrying about how a speech will go and feeling that another person’s gaze threatens one’s existence as an independent person are different concerns, even if both involve being watched.
Laing describes some people as experiencing their minds as if they were transparent to others. This is an account of felt exposure, not evidence that another person can directly read their thoughts. Keeping experience and external fact distinct is essential to understanding the passage. [1]
Recognition can support a sense of reality
One function of being seen is reassurance. Another person’s response can help someone feel present, continuous and significant. Laing uses both clinical material and a literary example from Kafka to explore dependence on this recognition. Those forms of evidence should be distinguished: a literary portrayal can illuminate a possibility without establishing its prevalence or cause. [1]
In the position Laing describes, awareness of being seen can become
a means of assuring himself that he exists, and also that they exist.
R. D. Laing — The Divided Self, p. 108 (excerpt) [1]
By the chapter’s end, he makes clear that being perceived is more than a visual matter. Being heard, known and responded to can also confirm a person’s presence. His argument concerns recognition through a relationship, rather than an isolated act of looking. [1]
An invented everyday illustration is the difference between entering a room where someone greets you by name and entering one where everyone continues as though you were absent. The responses can alter the felt situation without determining your whole identity. Laing’s clinical concern lies in more precarious circumstances, where recognition appears necessary to sustain a basic sense of being.
The same attention can feel dangerous
The other side of the argument is exposure. Visibility allows another person to inspect, classify or act upon us. In Laing’s account, someone may experience this attention as taking possession of them or reducing them to an object. Concealment then appears protective, even while isolation brings its own insecurity. [1]
This is why more attention is not automatically reassuring. The significance of attention depends on whose attention it is, how it is experienced and what relationship it expresses. A person may seek company while avoiding the particular encounter through which they could become known.
The paradox is central: hiding can prevent a feared intrusion, yet also prevent the recognition the person longs for. Neither visibility nor invisibility supplies an uncomplicated solution.
James: attracting attention while concealing himself
Laing’s account of James makes this tension concrete. James seeks other people because solitude leaves him feeling unreal, yet presents an outward manner he experiences as disconnected from himself. His conspicuous behaviour draws attention while keeping what he regards as his real self concealed. [1]
Laing’s interpretation challenges a simple inference from visible display to comfortable self-revelation. A person can be highly noticeable while feeling almost entirely unknown. In James’s case, the appearance of exhibitionism is interpreted through fear of disclosure and dependence on an audience.
The account should remain attached to the case. Loudness, distinctive dress or sociability do not establish a hidden divided self. Their meaning must be investigated rather than supplied by resemblance to a description in a book.
Becoming one’s own observer
Self-observation can take on the work that another person’s attention performs. Laing describes someone monitoring themselves in an attempt to preserve identity and control danger. Yet the monitoring can become hostile: instead of participating in an activity, the person scrutinises themselves participating. [1]
Within his account, this can diminish the spontaneity the person is trying to protect. Awareness becomes both an assurance of existence and a source of estrangement. The issue is not reflection in general, but the specific character and function of this relentless observation.
The later discussion develops interpretations of childhood games, mirrors and the experience of being watched over. These are speculative developmental readings. They do not establish that a particular parental action causes later distress, and ordinary childhood play should not be treated as a diagnostic sign. [1]
What the account contributes
Laing offers a way to distinguish the amount of attention someone receives from the kind of recognition they experience. His account also shows why an outward behaviour may perform several functions at once: attracting notice, avoiding disclosure, sustaining identity and managing threat.
These are interpretive questions, not a checklist for identifying a disorder. Read in its historical setting, the chapter connects bodily presence and detachment with the false-self system. His later writing on confirmation and disconfirmation develops the relational question of how a response can recognise the person who is actually there.
Continue reading
References and source notes
- Laing, R. D. (1960). The Divided Self: An Existential Study in Sanity and Madness. References use the Pelican edition, Penguin Books, 1970 reprint.Cited: chapter 7, pp. 106–107; p. 106; chapter 7, pp. 106–108; chapter 7, pp. 108–109; p. 108; chapter 7, p. 119; chapter 7, pp. 109–113; chapter 7, pp. 113–114; chapter 7, pp. 112–113; chapter 7, pp. 115–119.